Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Effect of smoking on pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel, an antiplatelet drug

Ola Diab1, Tawfiq Arafat2,3, Al-Motassem Yousef1

1Department of Biopharmaceutics and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Jordan; 2Jordan Center for Pharmaceutical Research, 3Pharmaceutical Medicinal Chemistry & Pharmacognosy, Petra University, Amman, Jordan.

For correspondence:-  Al-Motassem Yousef   Email: ayousef@ju.edu.jo   Tel:+962777486930

Received: 16 May 2014        Accepted: 20 February 2015        Published: 26 April 2015

Citation: Diab O, Arafat T, Yousef A. Effect of smoking on pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel, an antiplatelet drug. Trop J Pharm Res 2015; 14(4):693-700 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v14i4.19

© 2015 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the influence of smoking cigarettes on the pharmacokinetics of the antiplatelet drug, clopidogrel.
Methods: Thirty four male patients, mean age and weight of 59.3 years and 81.1 kg, respectively, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), took part in the study. Each subject received an oral loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel eight tablets, each 75 mg). Clopidogrel carboxylate plasma level was measured and non-compartmental analysis was used to determine peak plasma concentration (Cmax), time to achieve peak plasma concentration (Tmax), elimination half-life (t1/2e), and area under the curve (AUC0-∞). Other parameters measured include gamma-glutamyltransferase enzyme (GGT), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-cholesterol), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and platelet count.
Results: Nineteen patients were smokers (55.9 %). Smokers had higher levels of GGT compared to non-smokers (31.73 ± 14.42 vs. 21.63 ± 11.41 IU/L, p = 0.08) as well as higher levels of LDL-cholesterol (116.79 ± 42.08 vs. 87.07 ± 27.34 mg/dl, p = 0.041, respectively). Smokers had shorter half-life (smokers: 3.47 ± 1.9 h vs. non-smokers: 5.83 ± 4.09 h, p = 0.012). Smoking behavior had no influence on Cmax (p = 0.16), AUC0-∞ (p = 0.65) or Tmax (p = 0.91). In general, the pharmacokinetic parameters were characterized by considerable inter-individual variation (Cmax = 23.2 ± 8.79 µg/ml, coefficient of variation (CV) = 37.9 %), (Tmax = 1.71 ± 1.15 h, CV = 67.2 %), (AUC0-∞ = 120.97 ± 44.4 µg.h/ml, CV = 36.7 %) and (t1/2e = 4.57 ± 3.15 h, CV = 68.9 %).
Conclusion: Smoking behavior may not be a significant determinant of the pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel following oral administration of 600 mg dose in patients undergoing PCI.

Keywords: Antiplatelet, Clopidogrel, Pharmacokinetics, Smoking, Cigarette

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates